View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Operations ABC Analysis |  Product Strategy ICE Scoring |  Business Strategy Three Horizons |  Delivery Cost of Delay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | With many similar objects of differing economic significance, the method prioritizes effort by effect. It separates what needs regular steering from what rarely needs attention. | When ideas need sorting quickly, it condenses impact, confidence, and effort into one compact score. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as an ICE table and top-ideas list. | Three Horizons helps clarify strategic options across different timeframes. It compares strengths, risks, market logic, and investment choices, and captures the result as a horizon map, portfolio view, and initiatives per horizon. | Helps clarify scope, order, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, constraints, and sequence manageable. The result is captured as a Cost of Delay table and prioritization sequence. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 30-60 min | Halbtags-Workshop, dann iterativ | 90-180 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-5 | 2-8 | 3-12 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | ABC Classification, Focus Rules, Control List | ICE Table, Top Idea List | Horizon map, Portfolio view, Initiatives per horizon, Resource plan | CoD Table, Prioritization Sequence |
Tagsno overlap | PrioritizationOperationsPortfolio | PrioritizationScoringGrowthDecision | StrategyInnovationPortfolioForesight | PrioritizationDeliveryEconomicsDecision |