View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Operations ABC Analysis | ![]() Architecture arc42 | ![]() Product Strategy ICE Scoring | ![]() Architecture Architecture Decision Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | With many similar objects of differing economic significance, the method prioritizes effort by effect. It separates what needs regular steering from what rarely needs attention. | arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes. | When ideas need sorting quickly, it condenses impact, confidence, and effort into one compact score. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as an ICE table and top-ideas list. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 1-2 Tage | 30-60 min | 15-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-5 | 1-4 | 2-8 | 1-3 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | ABC Classification, Focus Rules, Control List | Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment View | ICE Table, Top Idea List | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale |
Tagsno overlap | PrioritizationOperationsPortfolio | ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication | PrioritizationScoringGrowthDecision | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance |



