methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for ABC Analysis
Operations
ABC Analysis
Paper illustration of a review with planned work, actual event sequence, comparison, and assigned improvement actions.
Operations
After-Action Review
Paper illustration for PDCA Cycle.
Operations
PDCA Cycle
Gemba Walk workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
Gemba Walk
Purposedifferent
With many similar objects of differing economic significance, the method prioritizes effort by effect. It separates what needs regular steering from what rarely needs attention.After missions or project phases with unclear outcomes, the method makes visible what actually happened and what can be learned from it. It separates course, effect, and causes so experience turns into solid improvement.For an improvement that still has to prove itself in everyday work, the method runs it through small learning loops. It connects planning, checking, and standardization into a repeatable learning mode.When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions.
Complexitysame
LowLowLowLow
Timedifferent
30-60 min20-45 min1 h bis mehrere Wochen30-120 min
Participantsdifferent
1-53-121-82-6
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
ABC Classification, Focus Rules, Control ListLessons learned, Action items, Event summaryPDCA Log, Experiment Plan, Learning Outcome, Standard ChangeObservation Notes, Improvement Ideas
Tagsno overlap
PrioritizationOperationsPortfolio
LearningOperationsImprovement
Continuous improvementLeanExperiments
LeanObservationProcessOperations
Add more methods