View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Growth A/B Testing |  Facilitation Power Interest Grid |  Product Discovery Fake Door Test |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects. | When many stakeholders compete for attention at once, the Power Interest Grid sorts them by influence and stake. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Power Interest Grid and a stakeholder-specific strategy. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-4 Wochen | 30-60 min | 1-5 Tage | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 1-6 | 2-8 | Nutzertraffic | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Experiment results, Decision log, Learning summary | Power Interest Grid, Strategy per Stakeholder | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions |
Tagsno overlap | ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentPlanning | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation |