View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Operations A3 Problem Solving |  Agile Start Stop Continue |  Innovation Contradiction Analysis |  Agile Starfish Retrospective |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together. | When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood. | When a system should improve while another measure suffers as a result, the method makes the underlying conflict precisely formulable. It separates the desired effect from its side effect. This makes solutions possible that address the contradiction deliberately instead of half-heartedly. | When improvement options need to be sorted more finely than just start and stop, it brings observations into clear kinds of action. This makes visible what should be done more, less, newly, or continued. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 30-60 min | 60-120 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-5 | 3-12 | 2-8 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | A3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause Analysis | Start Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions | Contradiction Statement, Abstraction Notes, Solution Principles, Concept Ideas | Starfish Board, Practice Changes, Experiments |
Tagsno overlap | LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations | RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection | ContradictionsInnovationProblem solving | RetrospectiveImprovementExperimentsTeam |