View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Operations A3 Problem Solving |  Agile Start Stop Continue |  Innovation Contradiction Analysis |  Agile Mad Sad Glad |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together. | When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood. | When a system should improve while another measure suffers as a result, the method makes the underlying conflict precisely formulable. It separates the desired effect from its side effect. This makes solutions possible that address the contradiction deliberately instead of half-heartedly. | When a team's or workshop's mood needs to become readable, it structures emotional signals with little setup. It makes strain, relief, and sources of energy tangible. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 30-60 min | 60-120 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-5 | 3-12 | 2-8 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | A3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause Analysis | Start Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions | Contradiction Statement, Abstraction Notes, Solution Principles, Concept Ideas | Emotion Board, Themes, Action Items |
Tagsno overlap | LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations | RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection | ContradictionsInnovationProblem solving | RetrospectiveTeamReflection |