View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:A3 Problem SolvingStakeholder Salience ModelFailure Mode and Effects AnalysisAlignment Mapping
| Criterion |  Operations A3 Problem Solving |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |  Operations Failure Mode and Effects Analysis |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. | For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 60-90 min | 2-6 h | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 2-5 | 3-6 | 3-10 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | A3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause Analysis | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class | FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions |
Tagsno overlap | LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance | RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation |