methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A3 Problem-Solving workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
A3 Problem Solving
A hypothetical failure makes concrete risks, signals, and fitting mitigations visible.
Decision Making
Pre-Mortem
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Purposedifferent
For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together.In early initiatives with many uncertainties, planning quickly turns too optimistic. A pre-mortem makes the expected failure visible in advance and sharpens the view of causes, gaps, and countermeasures.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowLow
Timedifferent
45-90 min20–45 min10-20 min daily15-30 min
Participantsdifferent
2-5Small cross-functional group12-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
A3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause AnalysisRisk list, Mitigation plan, Assumption logDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesRoot cause notes, Countermeasures
Tagsno overlap
LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations
RiskDecisionFailurePlanning
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
Add more methods