methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A3 Problem-Solving workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
A3 Problem Solving
Paper illustration of the McKinsey 7S Framework with seven connected fields
Business Strategy
McKinsey 7S
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Purposedifferent
For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together.McKinsey 7S checks whether Strategy, Structure, Systems, Shared Values, Skills, Style, and Staff fit together. Organizational misalignments become visible across multiple levers as a result.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
45-90 min2-4 h10-20 min daily1-2 h
Participantsdifferent
2-53-1214-12
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
A3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause Analysis7S Assessment, Alignment Gaps, Change ActionsDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions
Tagsno overlap
LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations
OrganizationStrategyAlignmentChange
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
Add more methods