View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Operations A3 Problem Solving |  Knowledge Modeling Knowledge Mapping |  Operations Kaizen Event |  Knowledge Modeling Concept Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together. | Knowledge Mapping makes knowledge, gaps, and transfer paths visible across a field. It fits when expertise should not just exist but also be findable and transferable. | For a tightly scoped process segment with noticeable waste, the method bundles shared energy for change. It suits situations that call for fast learning loops and visible adjustments. | Concept Mapping arranges terms and relationships in a network that makes subject-matter connections tangible. It fits when a topic needs to be understood structurally rather than linearly. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 1-3 h | 0.5-5 Tage | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 2-5 | 3-12 | 4-10 | 1-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | A3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause Analysis | Knowledge Map, Critical Knowledge Areas, Transfer Plan | Kaizen Charter, Waste List, Improvement Experiments, Standard Work Update | Concept Map, Relationship Labels, Knowledge Gaps |
Tagsno overlap | LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations | KnowledgeMappingRisk | LeanContinuous improvementOperations | KnowledgeConceptsMappingSensemaking |