methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A3 Problem-Solving workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
A3 Problem Solving
Paper illustration of Goal Question Metric with its method-specific working model.
Engineering
Goal Question Metric
Gemba Walk workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
Gemba Walk
Paper illustration of HEART Framework with its method-specific working model.
UX Research
HEART Framework
Purposedifferent
For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together.Helps clarify technical problems, hypotheses, and next steps in concrete terms. It breaks a technical problem into testable parts. The result is captured as a GQM table and metric briefs.When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions.Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
45-90 min90-180 min30-120 min120 min initial, dann laufend
Participantsdifferent
2-53-62-63-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
A3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause AnalysisGQM Table, Metric ProfilesObservation Notes, Improvement IdeasHEART-GSM Table, Dashboard
Tagsno overlap
LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations
MetricsMeasurementEngineeringAlignment
LeanObservationProcessOperations
MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction
Add more methods