methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A3 Problem-Solving workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
A3 Problem Solving
Paper illustration of GIST Planning with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
GIST Planning
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Purposedifferent
For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together.GIST Planning helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities. It links customer value, product logic, and decision priorities, and captures the result as goals, an idea bank, and a step-project list.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
45-90 minWochen bis Monate je Goal15-30 min10-20 min daily
Participantsdifferent
2-53-102-61
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopAsync
Outputdifferent
A3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause AnalysisGoals, Idea bank, Step-project list, Tasks, Learning reportsRoot cause notes, CountermeasuresDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review Notes
Tagsno overlap
LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations
RoadmapOutcomesPlanningExperiments
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
Add more methods