methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A3 Problem-Solving workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
A3 Problem Solving
First-click Testing method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
First-click Testing
Paper illustration for Kaizen Event.
Operations
Kaizen Event
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Purposedifferent
For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together.When users immediately turn the wrong way on a screen or wireframe, first click testing checks initial orientation at high speed. The first click shows early whether expectation, labeling, and wayfinding fit together.For a tightly scoped process segment with noticeable waste, the method bundles shared energy for change. It suits situations that call for fast learning loops and visible adjustments.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
45-90 min1-2 Tage0.5-5 Tage15-30 min
Participantsdifferent
2-510-304-102-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
A3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause AnalysisClick Heatmap, Success Rate, Design RecommendationsKaizen Charter, Waste List, Improvement Experiments, Standard Work UpdateRoot cause notes, Countermeasures
Tagsno overlap
LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations
UXNavigationFindabilityValidation
LeanContinuous improvementOperations
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
Add more methods