methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A3 Problem-Solving workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
A3 Problem Solving
Paper illustration of the Consensus Workshop working structure.
Facilitation
Consensus Workshop
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Purposedifferent
For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together.When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
45-90 min1-3 h10-20 min daily15-30 min
Participantsdifferent
2-55-3012-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
A3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause AnalysisConsensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority AreasDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesRoot cause notes, Countermeasures
Tagsno overlap
LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations
FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
Add more methods