methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
A paper-based illustration representing Service Blueprint with its core stages and visible working result.
UX Design
Service Blueprinting
Paper illustration for Kepner-Tregoe
Operations
Kepner-Tregoe
Paper illustration of Barrier Analysis with its method-specific working model.
Operations
Barrier Analysis
Purposedifferent
For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.When a service experience is spread across several touchpoints, it brings frontstage and backstage together. It shows where user contact and internal responsibility must fit.For a disturbance that's hard to pin down, the method cleanly separates problem, cause, and decision. It reduces mixing when symptoms allow several interpretations.For a risk that can only be managed through multiple layers of protection, the method examines the effectiveness of each barrier. It shows where safeguards are missing, too weak, or fail under real conditions.
Complexitydifferent
LowHighHighMedium
Timedifferent
15-30 min0.5-2 Tage2-8 h2-4 h
Participantsdifferent
2-66-122-82-6
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Root cause notes, CountermeasuresService Blueprint, Fail Points, Ownership MapProblem Analysis, Decision Analysis, Risk PlanBarrier Inventory, Failure Analysis per Barrier, Action Backlog
Tagsno overlap
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
Service designOperationsJourneyBlueprint
Problem solvingRoot causeDecisionOperations
Root causeSafetyIncident
Add more methods