methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
A structured reflection surfaces what was liked, learned, lacked, and longed for. It is a conversation format and does not validate actions automatically.
Agile
4Ls Retrospective
Paper illustration for Root Cause Analysis.
Operations
Root Cause Analysis
Paper illustration for Learning Review.
Operations
Learning Review
Purposedifferent
For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time.When a problem keeps recurring and the cause stays unclear, the method exposes the underlying mechanism. It separates symptom, guess, and robust explanation from one another.After a project phase with mixed results, the method makes learning from the individual case reusable. It connects events, decisions, and systemic conditions into robust insights.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
15-30 min45–75 min1-4 h1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
2-6Team members involved3-83-10
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Root cause notes, Countermeasures4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement ActionsProblem Statement, Cause Hypotheses, Confirmed Causes, Action PlanLearning Review Notes, System Factors, Improvement Actions
Tagsno overlap
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam
Root causeProblem solvingQualityIncident
LearningRetrospectiveIncidentOperations
Add more methods