View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile 4Ls Retrospective |  Team Design Team API |  Knowledge Modeling Feynman Technique |  Facilitation Expectation Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. | When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document. | The Feynman Technique checks understanding by explaining a topic so that it stays easy for others to understand. It makes knowledge gaps visible before they become costly in everyday work. | When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 45–75 min | Half day initial, dann laufend | 20-60 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | Team members involved | Ein Team plus Stakeholder | 1 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions | Team API Document | Plain-language Explanation, Knowledge Gaps, Study Notes | Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements |
Tagsno overlap | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam | TeamAlignmentCommunicationService | LearningKnowledgeUnderstanding | AlignmentStakeholdersTeam |