methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A structured reflection surfaces what was liked, learned, lacked, and longed for. It is a conversation format and does not validate actions automatically.
Agile
4Ls Retrospective
Paper illustration for Teach-back.
Knowledge Modeling
Teach-back
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Paper illustration for Mad Sad Glad
Agile
Mad Sad Glad
Purposedifferent
When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time.Teach-back checks whether an explanation actually got through to the other person. The method makes misunderstandings visible early and strengthens shared understanding in advisory and learning situations.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.When a team's or workshop's mood needs to become readable, it structures emotional signals with little setup. It makes strain, relief, and sources of energy tangible.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
45–75 min5-20 min1-2 h30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
Team members involved2-84-123-10
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement ActionsUnderstanding Check, Clarification Notes, Learning GapsAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision QuestionsEmotion Board, Themes, Action Items
Tagsno overlap
RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam
LearningUnderstandingCommunication
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
RetrospectiveTeamReflection
Add more methods