View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile 4Ls Retrospective | ![]() Agile Start Stop Continue | ![]() Facilitation Expectation Mapping | ![]() Agile Sailboat Retrospective |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. | When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood. | When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge. | When a team wants to read momentum, brakes, and risks together, it offers an easily understandable picture of the situation. It makes drive, obstacles, and headwind visible in the same picture. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 45–75 min | 30-60 min | 45-90 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | Team members involved | 3-12 | 3-12 | 4-12 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions | Start Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions | Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements | Sailboat Board, Risks, Improvement Actions |
Tags1 shared | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam | RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection | AlignmentStakeholdersTeam | RetrospectiveTeamImprovement |



