View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile 4Ls Retrospective |  Operations Runbook |  Agile Start Stop Continue |  Operations After-Action Review |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. | For recurring operational tasks or incidents, the method keeps solid action logic ready. It reduces uncertainty when time pressure, role changes, or rare situations demand fast access. | When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood. | After missions or project phases with unclear outcomes, the method makes visible what actually happened and what can be learned from it. It separates course, effect, and causes so experience turns into solid improvement. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 45–75 min | 20-60 min | 30-60 min | 20-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | Team members involved | 1-4 | 3-12 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions | Runbook, Checklist, Escalation Path | Start Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions | Lessons learned, Action items, Event summary |
Tagsno overlap | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam | OperationsReliabilityDocumentation | RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection | LearningOperationsImprovement |