View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile 4Ls Retrospective |  Agile ROAM Board |  Delivery RAID Log |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45–75 min | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 60-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | Team members involved | 3-15 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions | ROAM Board, Owner List | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class |
Tagsno overlap | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance |