methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A structured reflection surfaces what was liked, learned, lacked, and longed for. It is a conversation format and does not validate actions automatically.
Agile
4Ls Retrospective
Paper illustration of Riskiest Assumption Test with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Product Discovery
Riskiest Assumption Test
Paper illustration for Mad Sad Glad
Agile
Mad Sad Glad
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Purposedifferent
When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time.When an idea hinges on one critical unknown, it prioritizes testing that exact piece of uncertainty first. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a prioritized list of assumptions, a test plan, and a result report.When a team's or workshop's mood needs to become readable, it structures emotional signals with little setup. It makes strain, relief, and sources of energy tangible.When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
45–75 min1-2 Wochen pro Iteration30-60 min1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
Team members involved2-63-10Nutzertraffic
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopAsync
Outputdifferent
4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement ActionsPrioritized Assumption List, Test Plan, Results ReportEmotion Board, Themes, Action ItemsClick Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision
Tagsno overlap
RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryAssumptions
RetrospectiveTeamReflection
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
Add more methods