View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile 4Ls Retrospective |  Operations Process Mapping |  Agile Sailboat Retrospective |  Operations After-Action Review |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. | With a confusing workflow that has many handoffs, the method makes the actual process visible. It shows where work is passed on, delayed, or duplicated, so improvement targets the right spots. | When a team wants to read momentum, brakes, and risks together, it offers an easily understandable picture of the situation. It makes drive, obstacles, and headwind visible in the same picture. | After missions or project phases with unclear outcomes, the method makes visible what actually happened and what can be learned from it. It separates course, effect, and causes so experience turns into solid improvement. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 45–75 min | 1-3 h | 45-90 min | 20-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | Team members involved | 3-10 | 4-12 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions | Process Map, Handoff List, Improvement Backlog | Sailboat Board, Risks, Improvement Actions | Lessons learned, Action items, Event summary |
Tagsno overlap | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam | ProcessOperationsImprovement | RetrospectiveTeamImprovement | LearningOperationsImprovement |