methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A structured reflection surfaces what was liked, learned, lacked, and longed for. It is a conversation format and does not validate actions automatically.
Agile
4Ls Retrospective
Paper illustration of an IBIS map with issues, positions and arguments
Knowledge Modeling
IBIS
Paper illustration for Feynman Technique.
Knowledge Modeling
Feynman Technique
Paper illustration for Mad Sad Glad
Agile
Mad Sad Glad
Purposedifferent
When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time.IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus.The Feynman Technique checks understanding by explaining a topic so that it stays easy for others to understand. It makes knowledge gaps visible before they become costly in everyday work.When a team's or workshop's mood needs to become readable, it structures emotional signals with little setup. It makes strain, relief, and sources of energy tangible.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
45–75 min1-3 h20-60 min30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
Team members involved2-813-10
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement ActionsIssue Map, Positions, Argument NotesPlain-language Explanation, Knowledge Gaps, Study NotesEmotion Board, Themes, Action Items
Tagsno overlap
RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam
RationaleKnowledgeDecision
LearningKnowledgeUnderstanding
RetrospectiveTeamReflection
Add more methods