View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile 4Ls Retrospective |  Knowledge Modeling IBIS |  Knowledge Modeling Feynman Technique |  Operations Learning Review |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. | IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus. | The Feynman Technique checks understanding by explaining a topic so that it stays easy for others to understand. It makes knowledge gaps visible before they become costly in everyday work. | After a project phase with mixed results, the method makes learning from the individual case reusable. It connects events, decisions, and systemic conditions into robust insights. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45–75 min | 1-3 h | 20-60 min | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | Team members involved | 2-8 | 1 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions | Issue Map, Positions, Argument Notes | Plain-language Explanation, Knowledge Gaps, Study Notes | Learning Review Notes, System Factors, Improvement Actions |
Tagsno overlap | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam | RationaleKnowledgeDecision | LearningKnowledgeUnderstanding | LearningRetrospectiveIncidentOperations |