View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile 4Ls Retrospective |  Facilitation Fishbowl Discussion |  Agile Start Stop Continue |  Knowledge Modeling Peer Instruction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. | When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover. | When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood. | Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45–75 min | 45-90 min | 30-60 min | 10-20 min je Frage |
Participantsdifferent | Team members involved | 8-80 | 3-12 | 6-50 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions | Discussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions | Start Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions | Concept Questions, Vote Results, Learning Notes |
Tagsno overlap | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam | FacilitationDialogueLarge group | RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection | LearningDialogueFacilitation |