View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile 4Ls Retrospective |  Facilitation Fishbowl Discussion |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |  Facilitation Barcamp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. | When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. | When many people can contribute knowledge and the flow should stay open, Barcamp provides a framework for self-organized sessions. The format channels energy without defining the content too narrowly in advance. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45–75 min | 45-90 min | 45-90 min | Halber Tag bis 2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | Team members involved | 8-80 | 3-10 | 15-200 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions | Discussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions | Session Board, Session Notes, Community Learnings |
Tagsno overlap | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam | FacilitationDialogueLarge group | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation | FacilitationLarge groupLearning |