View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile 4Ls Retrospective |  Product Strategy DIBB |  Agile Mad Sad Glad |  Decision Making Delphi Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. | When a team's or workshop's mood needs to become readable, it structures emotional signals with little setup. It makes strain, relief, and sources of energy tangible. | When knowledge is distributed and direct dominance should be avoided, groups quickly fall under the sway of their opinion leaders. The Delphi Method gathers assessments iteratively and gradually brings expert judgments closer together. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 45–75 min | 1-2 h | 30-60 min | 1-4 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | Team members involved | 2-8 | 3-10 | 6-30 Experten |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report | Emotion Board, Themes, Action Items | Expert Forecast, Consensus Range, Assumption Notes |
Tagsno overlap | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis | RetrospectiveTeamReflection | ForecastingExpertsDecisionStrategy |