View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile 4Ls Retrospective | ![]() Knowledge Modeling Concept Mapping | ![]() Agile Start Stop Continue | ![]() Agile Sprint Retrospective |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. | Concept Mapping arranges terms and relationships in a network that makes subject-matter connections tangible. It fits when a topic needs to be understood structurally rather than linearly. | When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood. | When a sprint is over and friction shouldn't simply be carried forward, it opens the view onto collaboration and patterns. It creates space to see causes and changes together. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 45–75 min | 1-2 h | 30-60 min | Up to 3 hours for a one-month Sprint; shorter Sprints are usually shorter |
Participantsdifferent | Team members involved | 1-8 | 3-12 | Scrum Team |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions | Concept Map, Relationship Labels, Knowledge Gaps | Start Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions | Improvement actions, Team agreements |
Tagsno overlap | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam | KnowledgeConceptsMappingSensemaking | RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection | RetrospectiveImprovementLearning |



