methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A structured reflection surfaces what was liked, learned, lacked, and longed for. It is a conversation format and does not validate actions automatically.
Agile
4Ls Retrospective
Paper illustration for Accountability Ladder
Operations
Accountability Ladder
Paper session grid with two time blocks, three rooms, colored session cards and an open topic pool.
Facilitation
Barcamp
Paper illustration for Responsibility Poker.
Facilitation
Responsibility Poker
Purposedifferent
When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time.With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on.When many people can contribute knowledge and the flow should stay open, Barcamp provides a framework for self-organized sessions. The format channels energy without defining the content too narrowly in advance.When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
45–75 min20-45 minHalber Tag bis 2 Tage45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
Team members involved1-815-2003-10
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement ActionsOwnership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching NotesSession Board, Session Notes, Community LearningsResponsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions
Tagsno overlap
RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam
ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam
FacilitationLarge groupLearning
RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation
Add more methods