View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation 1-2-4-All |  Facilitation Delegation Poker |  Innovation Reverse Brainstorming |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many people in a group too rarely get to speak, 1-2-4-All distributes thinking time more fairly. The format builds participation step by step and makes quiet or still-unformed thoughts usable faster. | When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice. | For persistent errors or blockages, the method shifts the view to the opposite of the desired effect. It exposes the mechanics of failure and makes hidden causes easier to grasp. This makes improvement more concrete and the problem clearer. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 10-20 min | 45-90 min | 30-60 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-100+ | 3-10 | 3-12 | 3-10 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Idea List, Shared Insights, Emergent Themes | Delegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role Agreements | Reverse Ideas, Risk Themes, Solution Ideas | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationInclusionIdeation | AutonomyRolesTeam | BrainstormingIdeationCreativityRisk | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation |