View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile WSJF |  Delivery RAID Log |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |  Agile ROAM Board |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many tasks compete for the same capacity, it orders work by economic impact. It makes time lost, benefit, and effort comparable together. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 1-2 h | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 4-12 | 3-15 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Ranked Backlog, Cost-of-Delay Assumptions | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions | ROAM Board, Owner List |
Tagsno overlap | LeanEconomicsSequencePrioritization | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment |