View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile WSJF |  Product Discovery Opportunity Scoring |  Product Strategy DIBB |  UX Design Lean UX Canvas |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many tasks compete for the same capacity, it orders work by economic impact. It makes time lost, benefit, and effort comparable together. | When opportunities need ranking by their effect, it makes importance and satisfaction directly comparable. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as an opportunity-score table and top outcomes. | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. | The Lean UX Canvas helps clarify user behavior, touchpoints, and concept decisions. It makes assumptions and desired outcomes visible and captures the result as a completed canvas, hypothesis list, and first experiment. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 60-120 min | 1-2 h | 2-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 3-6 | 2-8 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Ranked Backlog, Cost-of-Delay Assumptions | Opportunity Score Table, Top Outcomes | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report | Completed Lean UX Canvas, Hypothesis list, First experiment |
Tagsno overlap | LeanEconomicsSequencePrioritization | PrioritizationDiscoveryOutcomesNeeds | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis | CanvasHypothesisOutcomesDiscovery |