View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile WSJF |  Product Discovery Kano Model |  Facilitation Timeline |  Facilitation Nominal Group Technique |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many tasks compete for the same capacity, it orders work by economic impact. It makes time lost, benefit, and effort comparable together. | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. | When a project, incident, or change process is only remembered in fragments, Timeline brings the sequence back into a readable form. It makes turning points, precursors, and after-effects recognizable over the course of time. | When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 1-2 Tage | 30-90 min | 60-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 10-50 | 2-12 | 5-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Ranked Backlog, Cost-of-Delay Assumptions | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes | Timeline, Milestones, Insight Notes | Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority |
Tagsno overlap | LeanEconomicsSequencePrioritization | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer | TimelineFacilitationSequence | FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion |