View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile WSJF |  UX Research HEART Framework |  Engineering Goal Question Metric |  Product Discovery Kano Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many tasks compete for the same capacity, it orders work by economic impact. It makes time lost, benefit, and effort comparable together. | Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard. | Helps clarify technical problems, hypotheses, and next steps in concrete terms. It breaks a technical problem into testable parts. The result is captured as a GQM table and metric briefs. | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 120 min initial, dann laufend | 90-180 min | 1-2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 3-6 | 3-6 | 10-50 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Ranked Backlog, Cost-of-Delay Assumptions | HEART-GSM Table, Dashboard | GQM Table, Metric Profiles | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes |
Tagsno overlap | LeanEconomicsSequencePrioritization | MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction | MetricsMeasurementEngineeringAlignment | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer |