View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile WSJF | ![]() Business Strategy 5-Minuten VC-Check | ![]() Facilitation Consensus Workshop | ![]() Facilitation Dot Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many tasks compete for the same capacity, it orders work by economic impact. It makes time lost, benefit, and effort comparable together. | The 5-Minute VC Check clarifies opportunities and strategic options at the earliest idea stage. It compares problem quality, customer willingness to pay, alternatives, differentiation, and market potential, and captures the result as a VC-check note, go/sharpen/park decision, and risk list. | When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 5-15 min | 1-3 h | 5-15 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 1-5 | 5-30 | 3-20 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Ranked Backlog, Cost-of-Delay Assumptions | VC-check note, Go/sharpen/park decision, Risk and assumption list, Next validation step | Consensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist |
Tagsno overlap | LeanEconomicsSequencePrioritization | StartupValidationCompetition | FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization |



