View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile WSJF | ![]() Product Strategy DIBB | ![]() Operations Eat the Frog | ![]() Decision Making Assumption Surfacing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many tasks compete for the same capacity, it orders work by economic impact. It makes time lost, benefit, and effort comparable together. | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. | The method protects energy and attention for the task that creates the largest progress and is often postponed. | Plans often contain assumptions that were never openly stated and remain dangerous precisely because of that. Assumption Surfacing makes these silent premises visible and prioritizes which of them carry the initiative or could sink it. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 1-2 h | 15-90 min daily | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 2-8 | 1 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Ranked Backlog, Cost-of-Delay Assumptions | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report | Priority Task, Completion Note, Daily Focus | Assumption List, Critical Assumptions, Learning Plan |
Tagsno overlap | LeanEconomicsSequencePrioritization | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis | PrioritizationProductivityFocusExecution | AssumptionsRiskDecisionDiscovery |



