View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile WSJF | ![]() Architecture C4 Model | ![]() Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model | ![]() Architecture Architecture Communication Canvas |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many tasks compete for the same capacity, it orders work by economic impact. It makes time lost, benefit, and effort comparable together. | The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. | The Architecture Communication Canvas plans architecture communication so the right people receive the right message. The method turns technical complexity into deliberate communication design. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 1-4 h | 60-90 min | 60-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 1-5 | 3-6 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Ranked Backlog, Cost-of-Delay Assumptions | Context Diagram, Container Diagram, Component Diagram | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class | Communication Canvas, Stakeholder Messages, Architecture Communication Plan |
Tagsno overlap | LeanEconomicsSequencePrioritization | ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance | ArchitectureCommunicationStakeholdersCanvas |



