View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile WSJF | ![]() Product Discovery Assumption Mapping | ![]() Delivery Cost of Delay | ![]() Product Discovery Riskiest Assumption Test |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many tasks compete for the same capacity, it orders work by economic impact. It makes time lost, benefit, and effort comparable together. | When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first. | Helps clarify scope, order, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, constraints, and sequence manageable. The result is captured as a Cost of Delay table and prioritization sequence. | When an idea hinges on one critical unknown, it prioritizes testing that exact piece of uncertainty first. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a prioritized list of assumptions, a test plan, and a result report. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 45-60 min | 90-180 min | 1-2 Wochen pro Iteration |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 2-8 | 3-8 | 2-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Ranked Backlog, Cost-of-Delay Assumptions | Assumption map, Test backlog, Risk ranking | CoD Table, Prioritization Sequence | Prioritized Assumption List, Test Plan, Results Report |
Tagsno overlap | LeanEconomicsSequencePrioritization | AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation | PrioritizationDeliveryEconomicsDecision | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryAssumptions |



