View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile WSJF |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |  Product Discovery Opportunity Scoring |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many tasks compete for the same capacity, it orders work by economic impact. It makes time lost, benefit, and effort comparable together. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. | When opportunities need ranking by their effect, it makes importance and satisfaction directly comparable. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as an opportunity-score table and top outcomes. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 1-2 h | 60-120 min | 60-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 4-12 | 3-6 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Ranked Backlog, Cost-of-Delay Assumptions | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions | Opportunity Score Table, Top Outcomes | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class |
Tagsno overlap | LeanEconomicsSequencePrioritization | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation | PrioritizationDiscoveryOutcomesNeeds | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance |