View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile WSJF |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |  Product Discovery Opportunity Scoring |  Facilitation Power Interest Grid |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many tasks compete for the same capacity, it orders work by economic impact. It makes time lost, benefit, and effort comparable together. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. | When opportunities need ranking by their effect, it makes importance and satisfaction directly comparable. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as an opportunity-score table and top outcomes. | When many stakeholders compete for attention at once, the Power Interest Grid sorts them by influence and stake. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Power Interest Grid and a stakeholder-specific strategy. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 1-2 h | 60-120 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 4-12 | 3-6 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Ranked Backlog, Cost-of-Delay Assumptions | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions | Opportunity Score Table, Top Outcomes | Power Interest Grid, Strategy per Stakeholder |
Tagsno overlap | LeanEconomicsSequencePrioritization | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation | PrioritizationDiscoveryOutcomesNeeds | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentPlanning |