View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile WSJF |  Operations A3 Problem Solving |  Product Discovery Opportunity Scoring |  Operations 5 Whys |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many tasks compete for the same capacity, it orders work by economic impact. It makes time lost, benefit, and effort comparable together. | For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together. | When opportunities need ranking by their effect, it makes importance and satisfaction directly comparable. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as an opportunity-score table and top outcomes. | For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 45-90 min | 60-120 min | 15-30 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 2-5 | 3-6 | 2-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Ranked Backlog, Cost-of-Delay Assumptions | A3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause Analysis | Opportunity Score Table, Top Outcomes | Root cause notes, Countermeasures |
Tagsno overlap | LeanEconomicsSequencePrioritization | LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations | PrioritizationDiscoveryOutcomesNeeds | Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving |