View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Working Backwards |  Facilitation Consensus Workshop |  Growth North Star Metric |  Facilitation Dot Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When the target state and benefit need to be clear first, it thinks backward from the desired outcome into the product logic. It sharpens vision, objections, and value proposition before elaboration. | When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time. | When product teams track many metrics, the view of the actual customer outcome easily gets lost. A North Star Metric bundles growth, usage, and value contribution into one signal that makes the system's direction visible. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 4-8 h, mehrere Iterationen | 1-3 h | 1-2 h | 5-15 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-6 | 5-30 | 3-8 | 3-20 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Future Press Release, FAQ, Vision Statement | Consensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas | North Star metric, Input metric tree, Measurement cadence | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist |
Tagsno overlap | VisionNarrativeAlignment | FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment | GrowthMetricsAlignmentRetention | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization |