View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Working Agreements |  Decision Making PERT Estimation |  Agile ROAM Board |  Facilitation Dot Estimation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When collaboration needs more than implicit expectations, it lays out shared ground rules openly. It creates reliability for conduct, availability, and decision paths. | On complex initiatives, a plain average tends to understate just how uncertain the outcome really is. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a PERT Estimate, Expected Value, and Risk Notes. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 15-45 min | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 5-20 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 1-8 | 3-15 | 3-20 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Working Agreements, Team Norms, Review Cadence | PERT Estimate, Expected Value, Risk Notes | ROAM Board, Owner List | Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion Targets |
Tagsno overlap | TeamCollaborationAgile | EstimationUncertaintyRisk | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | EstimationEffortRisk |