View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile Working Agreements | ![]() Innovation Crazy 8s | ![]() Innovation Brainstorming | ![]() UX Design Design Studio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When collaboration needs more than implicit expectations, it lays out shared ground rules openly. It creates reliability for conduct, availability, and decision paths. | With only a few minutes available and a still-fuzzy solution search, the method forces a wide range of variants. It produces fast sketches before the first idea can settle in, making different directions directly comparable and open to further development. | When a team faces an open question with many obvious directions, the method first creates breadth instead of premature commitment. It separates idea flow from evaluation and makes lines of thought visible, creating a pool for selection and further development. | When several designs need to be quickly put in relation to each other, it makes ideas visible and comparable. It encourages early variants instead of long upfront debates. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 8-15 min | 30-60 min | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 1-10 | 4-12 | 3-8 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Working Agreements, Team Norms, Review Cadence | Sketch Set, Idea Shortlist, Direction Options | Idea pool, Theme clusters, Shortlist | Sketches, Concept Directions, Design Decisions |
Tagsno overlap | TeamCollaborationAgile | BrainstormingSketchingSpeedDivergenceDesign sprint | BrainstormingIdeationCreativityWorkshopDivergence | SketchingCollaborationIdeation |



