methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Wideband Delphi.
Decision Making
Wideband Delphi
Paper illustration of HEART Framework with its method-specific working model.
UX Research
HEART Framework
Paper illustration of DIBB with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
DIBB
Paper illustration of Counter Metrics with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
Counter Metrics
Purposedifferent
A single opinion rarely holds up for planning when the future is genuinely uncertain. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as an Estimate Range, Assumption Log, and Expert Consensus Notes.Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard.DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report.When a headline metric could mask side effects, it adds guardrail signals against unwanted outcomes. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as a counter-metric list and guardrail definitions.
Complexitydifferent
HighMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
1-4 h or multiple rounds120 min initial, dann laufend1-2 h30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
4-12 Experten3-62-82-6
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Estimate Range, Assumption Log, Expert Consensus NotesHEART-GSM Table, DashboardDIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning reportCounter Metric List, Guardrail Definitions
Tagsno overlap
EstimationExpertsForecasting
MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction
StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis
MetricsMeasurementStrategyExperiments
Add more methods