View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Wideband Delphi |  Facilitation Decision Jam |  Delivery Monte Carlo Forecasting |  Facilitation Consensus Workshop |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | A single opinion rarely holds up for planning when the future is genuinely uncertain. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as an Estimate Range, Assumption Log, and Expert Consensus Notes. | When a decision is stuck, Decision Jam loosens the knot through structured separation of problem, idea, and selection. The format creates movement without jumping prematurely at the first seemingly elegant answer. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as Forecast Percentiles, Throughput Dataset, and Risk Communication. | When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-4 h or multiple rounds | 60-90 min | 30-90 min Setup, danach laufend | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 Experten | 4-10 | 1-8 | 5-30 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Estimate Range, Assumption Log, Expert Consensus Notes | Problem Cluster, Prioritized Challenge, Experiment | Forecast Percentiles, Throughput Dataset, Risk Communication | Consensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationExpertsForecasting | FacilitationDecisionProblem solvingWorkshop | ForecastingFlowDelivery | FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment |