View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Operations Visual Management |  Operations Theory of Constraints |  Operations Gemba Walk |  Operations Process Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | With high tempo and many parallel topics, the method makes status, deviations, and priorities visible at a glance. It reduces search effort and prevents what matters from getting lost in daily work. | For a system that does not get faster despite effort, the method directs attention to the bottleneck. It concentrates improvement on the point that actually limits throughput. | When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions. | With a confusing workflow that has many handoffs, the method makes the actual process visible. It shows where work is passed on, delayed, or duplicated, so improvement targets the right spots. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | High | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | Ongoing | 2-4 h Analyse, laufend | 30-120 min | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 1-20 | 3-12 | 2-6 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Visual Board, Status Indicators, Exception Cues | Constraint Map, Improvement Plan, Flow Metrics | Observation Notes, Improvement Ideas | Process Map, Handoff List, Improvement Backlog |
Tags1 shared | SignalsOperationsVisual management | OperationsConstraintsFlowImprovement | LeanObservationProcessOperations | ProcessOperationsImprovement |