View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Visual ManagementStakeholder Salience ModelFailure Mode and Effects AnalysisAlignment Mapping
| Criterion |  Operations Visual Management |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |  Operations Failure Mode and Effects Analysis |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | With high tempo and many parallel topics, the method makes status, deviations, and priorities visible at a glance. It reduces search effort and prevents what matters from getting lost in daily work. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. | For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | Ongoing | 60-90 min | 2-6 h | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 1-20 | 3-6 | 3-10 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Visual Board, Status Indicators, Exception Cues | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class | FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions |
Tagsno overlap | SignalsOperationsVisual management | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance | RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation |