methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Visual Management workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
Visual Management
A structured reflection surfaces what was liked, learned, lacked, and longed for. It is a conversation format and does not validate actions automatically.
Agile
4Ls Retrospective
Paper illustration for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Operations
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Paper illustration for Mad Sad Glad
Agile
Mad Sad Glad
Purposedifferent
With high tempo and many parallel topics, the method makes status, deviations, and priorities visible at a glance. It reduces search effort and prevents what matters from getting lost in daily work.When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time.For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability.When a team's or workshop's mood needs to become readable, it structures emotional signals with little setup. It makes strain, relief, and sources of energy tangible.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowHighLow
Timedifferent
Ongoing45–75 min2-6 h30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
1-20Team members involved3-103-10
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Visual Board, Status Indicators, Exception Cues4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement ActionsFMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation ActionsEmotion Board, Themes, Action Items
Tagsno overlap
SignalsOperationsVisual management
RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam
RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause
RetrospectiveTeamReflection
Add more methods