View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Operations Visual Management | ![]() Agile 4Ls Retrospective | ![]() Operations Failure Mode and Effects Analysis | ![]() Agile Mad Sad Glad |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | With high tempo and many parallel topics, the method makes status, deviations, and priorities visible at a glance. It reduces search effort and prevents what matters from getting lost in daily work. | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. | For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability. | When a team's or workshop's mood needs to become readable, it structures emotional signals with little setup. It makes strain, relief, and sources of energy tangible. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | High | Low |
Timedifferent | Ongoing | 45–75 min | 2-6 h | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-20 | Team members involved | 3-10 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Visual Board, Status Indicators, Exception Cues | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions | FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions | Emotion Board, Themes, Action Items |
Tagsno overlap | SignalsOperationsVisual management | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam | RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause | RetrospectiveTeamReflection |



